Nerve Damage After Epidural. I Can't Hold My Baby

medical risks of epidural anesthesia during childbirth

1000edical Risks of Epidural Anesthesia During Childbirth

Lewis E. Mehl-Madrona, 1000.D., Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Family Medicine and Psychiatry
Department of Family Medicine
University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine

The Medical Risks of Epidural Anesthesia (Epidurals)

Q uick Index to this Paper

E pidural anesthesia has become increasingly popular for childbirth. The popular volume, What to Expect when You lot're Expecting, for example, portrays epidurals equally perfectly condom. The risks, even so, may be profoundly underplayed.

N ote: This is a site in progress. We are interested in detailing all the risks of epidural anesthesia for childbirth. There is currently a selection bias toward the risks. We welcome all readers to send u.s. studies almost epidurals regardless of the results, and then that we can continue to work toward a balanced site. Our bias is that epidurals have risks and that these risks are under-communicated to women, and that true informed consent is not given.

Epidurals and Pain Relief

For the most part, epidural analgesia does effectively relieve labor pain. ¹ Obstetrical anesthesiologists proceed to state that epidural analgesia has other, potentially catastrophic, agin effects but, with safety clinical practice, these problems are extremely rare. We will suggest in the material that follows that these complications are not extremely rare, and that women are not receiving adequate informed consent about what these complications are and their accompanying frequency. Nor are they being offered whatsoever serious alternatives to epidural anesthesia. Despite this, anesthesiologists such as Eberle and Norris argue that specific anaesthetic techniques ... or obstetrical management can limit or eliminate these risks of epidural labour analgesia. What must exist remembered for any technical procedure, is that it is studied in major academic centers where highly skilled professors supervise residents and all outcomes are monitored closely. The actual do, notwithstanding, takes place in smaller institutions by less qualified individuals then that the bodily complication rates of whatever procedure (obstetric, cardiac, pulmonary) are ever college than what are found in studies.

Overall Complications Rates for Epidural Anesthesia

A general estimate of the overall complication charge per unit of epidural anesthesia is 23%. ²

1. Furnishings of epidurals on cesarean rate:

When the dose is too big or when it sinks downwards into the sacral ("tailbone") region of the body, the perineum and the vagina are anesthetized. Anesthetic is intentionally injected into this area late in labor to deaden all sensation. When information technology "accidentally" happens earlier in labor, the muscles of the pelvic floor are prematurely relaxed, thereby interfering with the normal flexion and rotation of the infant's head equally information technology passes through the nativity canal. This interference can pb to abnormal presentations which are more unsafe for the baby or to what is called "failure to descend," an indication for Cesarean birth.

Thorp, et al ³ studied 711 consecutive nulliparous women at term, with cephalic fetal presentations and spontaneous onset of labor. They compared 447 patients who received epidural analgesia in labor with 264 patients who received either narcotics or no analgesia.

The incidence of cesarean department for dystocia was significantly greater (p < 0.005) in the epidural group (10.3%) than in the nonepidural grouping (3.8%). In that location remained a significantly increased incidence (p < 0.005) of cesarean section for dystocia in the epidural group after option bias was corrected and the following confounding variables were controlled by multivariate analysis: maternal age, race, gestational age, cervical dilatation on admission, utilise of oxytocin, duration of oxytocin use, maximum infusion rate of oxytocin, duration of labor, presence of meconium, and birth weight.

The incidence of cesarean section for fetal distress was similar (p > 0.20) in both groups. At that place were no clinically significant differences in frequency of low Apgar scores at 5 minutes or string arterial and venous blood gas parameters between the 2 groups. They concluded that epidural analgesia in labor increases the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women.

Oftentimes the epidural is so constructive that it eliminates uterine contractions. The nerves which tell the uterus to contract are all anesthetized. The uterus becomes quiet and must be driven artificially with the hormone oxytocin (Pitocin or Syntocinon).

As the cervix becomes fully dilated and the caput descends, the adult female (in a normal nascence) feels pain and pressure in the lower pelvis and rectum. The terminal injection of anesthetic during the process of epidural anesthesia occurs after the head has rotated and come down onto the perineum. Higher concentrations of anesthetic are used to clinch perineal relaxation. Sometimes the mother is saturday upright or at least at a 45 caste angle to be certain that the anesthetic will descend to the sacral nerve roots. When the sacral nerve roots are blocked, the woman looses the urge to push.

After controlling for potentially confounding variables with multiple logistic regression analysis, Adashek, et al ^iv found that epidural anesthesia was an independent risk factor for cesarean birth among women over age 35 (R = 0.195, p < 0.001).

At the 1997 meeting of the American Guild for Anesthesiology, a press release was issued nearly four studies involving a combined total of more than 22,000 women claiming that labor epidural analgesia does non increase a adult female's risk of having a cesarean delivery. ^v Three of the studies were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The quaternary appeared in the September 1997 issue of the medical periodical of Anesthesiology.

"The findings have significant implications for physicians, patients and insurers," said one of the researchers, Steven T. Fogel, Thousand.D., an anesthesiologist at Washington University Schoolhouse of Medicine in St. Louis. "Some physicians and insurance companies limit patient access to epidurals because they strongly believe that epidurals tin can prolong labor, "Dr. Fogel said. "Delaying or withholding an epidural forces the pregnant woman to suffer needlessly and does not lower the cesarean rate." Each year, nigh one-million women cull epidural blocks for safety and effective pain relief during labor.

A written report by Dr. Fogel and colleagues at Washington University analyzed labor and delivery data on 7,000 patients. The researchers compared the cesarean rates amongst offset-fourth dimension mothers during the 12 months earlier and the 16 months after epidural analgesia became available on asking at the hospital. They found no significant differences in cesarean section rates earlier and after the services introduction. "Epidural analgesia did not stop normal labor or cause cesarean deliveries, because the rate of cesareans did not alter," Dr. Fogel said.

Women may yet crave cesarean delivery following epidural blocks, but no direct cause-and-effect relationship has ever been established. "labor epidural anlagesia can exist associated with , merely does not crusade, cesarean section delivery," Dr Fogel said. "An aberrant labor can produce farthermost pain for mothers, and this pain leads women to ask for epidurals," he said.

"Our report has the advantage of following cesarean rates before and later on the introduction of a popular epidural service," Dr Fogel said. "Since patient demographics and cesarean department rates did not alter, we can safely and accurately conclude that the full number of cesarean deliveries performed was non afflicted by the availability of epidural analgesia."

Similar findings emerged from an assay of data on more than than 13,000 start-time mothers who gave birth between 1989 and 1995 at St. Luke'southward Roosevelt Hospital Center, a pedagogy hospital of Columbia University in New York City.

The analysis showed that the mother's age, the baby'south birth weight and utilize of the labor-inducing drug oxytocin increased the women's risk for cesarean sections. "Not only was epidural analgesia not a meaning risk factor just it was associated with slightly decreased cesarean department delivery risk." anesthesiologist David J. Birnbach, M.D., said.

By relieving pain, epidural analgesia may help some patients relax and this realization could facilitate labor, Dr. Birnbach said. "Nosotros're not suggesting the technique will prevent cesarean sections," he stressed, "but in our practice, epidurals are clearly non a cause." In addition, the use of epidural analgesia almost doubled at the hospital during the five years studied (from 37% to 68%) but the percent of cesarean sections deliveries did not increase, Dr. Birnbach said.

A third study at Boston'southward Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center reviewed the labor and delivery records of more than 2300 women who received ultra-low dose solutions of epidural medications. The ultra-low dose epidurals allow many women's labor to proceed comfortable, Stephen D. Pratt, Yard.D., said. For women requiring more pain relief, boosted medication tin can be given by the same epidural route.

The Boston written report showed that women who needed additional pain relief beyond the ultra-low dose were more likely to have cesareans. Women who needed more than than two additional doses were twice as probable to require a cesarean section every bit those who do not. "The slow, abnormal labor that leads to cesarean section is more than painful than normal labor and therefore requires stronger epidural medication," Dr Pratt said. "Epidural practise not crusade cesarean sections. Rather women who accept abnormal labor may be in more pain and therefore are more probable to demand an epidural and stronger medication."

The above three studies were retrospective studies done in choice situations/hospitals that had actively taken a new approach to reducing cesarean sections as well as hospitals that maintain such loftier cesarean section rates that the comparisons would exist insignificant due to cesarean rates of over 30%.

The only prospective study was the fourth one, conducted at the Academy of Texas Southwestern Medical Middle in Dallas. ^{half dozen} Seven hundred, 15 women of mixed parity in spontaneous labor at full term were randomly assigned to receive either epidural anesthesia (EA) or patient-controlled intravenous meperidine analgesia (PCMA). Epidural analgesia was maintained with a continous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with ii pg/ml fentanyl. Patient controlled analgesia was maintained as 10-15 mg meperidine given every 10 minutes every bit desired by the patient using a patient-controlled pump.

A total of 358 women were randomized to receive epidural anesthesia and 243 (68%) complied. Similarly, 357 women were randomized to receive patient-controlled analgesia, and 259 (73%) complied with that protocol. V women randomized to PCMA requested epidurals. Based upon an intent to treat analysis, there was no difference in the rate of cesarean deliveries between the two groups (EA, 4%, 95% CI: one.nine-6.2%; PCMA, 5%, 95% CI: 2.6-seven.ii%. Women in the epidural grouping reported lower pain scores during labor and delivery.

What is amazing is that this study was used to fence that epidurals did not increase chance for cesarean birth. What is defective, of grade, is a reasonable control group, such equally a doula. When one looks at the amazingly high amounts of meperidine that women could self-administrate, it is no wonder that so few requested an epidural, since they could hardly be expected to be very alert. A woman could receive xc mg of meperidine per hour. In actuality, the boilerplate amount of meperidine a adult female self-administered was 200 mg with the highest corporeality existence 500 mg. To give a sense of the amounts being given here, routinely in the emergency department, for treating ureterolithiasis (kidney stones), which most women concur is a more than astringent pain than labor, I would rarely administer more than 150 to 200 mg of meperidine over 12 hours. The average length of labor during which these women received their meperidine was under 12 hours. No one has asked the question of how such a massive dose of meperidine would bear upon the cesarean rate.

The authors stated, "Patient-Controlled intravenous analgesia is widely used in the United States to manage postoperative pain, although use during childbirth has been limited. One concern is newborn respiratory depression from increased narcotic administration to the female parent. Many women in our report used more than than 200 mg of meperidine during the class of their labor, but only 3.4% of infants were given naloxone to opposite respiratory depression. The mothers were visibly sedated but were invariably arousable and none experienced respiratory depression."

Since neither of us accept never had to give an infant naloxone in over thousand deliveries, we wonder what the indications would actually be. Nosotros suspect these infants were quite depressed to receive naloxone. Our feel with patient controlled analgesia is that the reason the patient stops pushing the button is that she gets so high a dose that she falls asleep. I doubtable the mothers were more compromised than the authors recollect, but none had to be intubated or artificially ventilated, therefore, "none experience respiratory depression."

The authors likewise under-emphasized the fact that all patients were enrolled at the same time in an aggressive program to reduce cesarean birth, consisting of:

No use of electronic fetal monitoring, even for epidurals (except for one test strip on admission), thereby necessitating nurse auscultation of the fetal centre rate and one-on-one patient care, both well known to reduce the cesarean charge per unit.
No patient admitted to the hospital before 4-5 cm of cervical dilation, also known to lower the cesarean charge per unit.
No drugs or epidurals until the adult female was v cm dilated, also known to reduce the cesarean rate.
All births attended by CNMs, which is known to reduce the cesarean charge per unit by 1-third of what obstetricians would do. For example, a report from Los Angeles County-USC Hospital showed a 4% cesarean rate in a 95% Hispanic population when they were attended by nurse-midwives. ⁷
Use of a blackness and Hispanic population. In an editorial discussion, the authors, themselves, comment on black and Hispanic populations having historically lower cesarean rates.

The authors' real conclusions are this: If you do everything possible to reduce the cesarean charge per unit for all patients, and then, if you compare epidural anesthesia with loftier dose, cocky-administered narcotic analgesia, there is no difference in the cesarean charge per unit. This is not really a very outstanding decision, though the popular printing read this effect equally maxim epidural anesthesia is at present proven condom and unlikely to increase the cesarean rate (without addressing the question, "over what?"

Some infants (0.8%) in the epidural group besides required naloxone. Two transfers to NICU occurred in the epidural group and iii in PCMA group.

Looking just at those who had epidurals vs. those who didn't, epidurals prolonged the first phase of labor and increased the incidence of oxytocin administration. Fever developed in more than women during epidural anesthesia. At that place was no divergence in the number of cesareans in the epidural vs. the PCIA grouping (the range from 3% to 7% cesarean rate).

Regarding other complications, 24% of women having epidurals had fever compared to 6% in PCMA. Nine percent had forceps with epidural compared to 3% with PCMA. In that location was a15-19% range of meconium during labor (not different between groups), which we observe rather loftier. At that place was a rate of ane.ii-1.viii% of infants suffering meconium aspiration (not different between groups), simply also rather high in our feel.

two. Significant Low Blood Pressure (Hypotension):

Significant low blood pressure is a complication of epidural anesthesia. ¹ The ways that epiduralized patients must prevarication accentuate this. Their position is limited since they are substantially paralyzed people for the duration of the epidural. Hypotension occurs among almost one-third of patients with serious hypotension occurring well-nigh 12% of the fourth dimension. ⁸

Maternal hypotension is a major gamble for the baby. The epidural blocks the nerves which regulate blood pressure. Information technology causes the blood in the body to pool, keeping information technology from beingness pumped around the body in the proper fashion. The arteries dilate and relax their usual, necessary level of tension, making it difficult for the eye to pump blood to the baby. These changes lead to a decrease in the output of the mothers centre. Less blood per unit fourth dimension can accomplish the placenta and therefore the baby.

The baby is completely dependent on the mothers heart to pump blood to the placenta to satisfy its needs. All of its oxygen comes across from the placenta. All of the food for its encephalon and other organs comes across the placenta. Brains cannot alive without a relatively constant supply of oxygen and glucose. Without this they become damaged.

A good blood flow is needed to the uterus between contractions and then it tin get fresh oxygen. During the contraction, blood flow to the uterus is cut off by the muscles contracting. When the contraction stops, the uterus must quickly refill with fresh claret containing oxygen for the infant. If the amount of blood flowing to the uterus is reduced, the baby may non be able to get the oxygen information technology needs. And then what is called fetal distress may occur. The babe's organisation does not get enough oxygen and goes into distress. Its claret retains excess acid, the oxygen levels go low and tissues and vital organs begin to fail from excess acid, lack of oxygen and lack of fuel.

Animate being studies have shown that lack of oxygen to the infant (called fetal hypoxia) can cause meaning damage to the baby's brain even without the pH of the baby's umbilical cord claret beingness affected. ⁹ (The pH of the babys umbilical cord claret at birth is ordinarily used as an indicator of whether or not fetal hypoxia has occurred.)

Severe low blood pressure level can also result from pinch of the mothers blood vessels (aorta and vena cava) since all mothers must prevarication essentially flat on their back later on epidural anesthesia (they cannot feel or move their back, pelvis and legs). ¹⁰

3. Fetal Distress:

Fetal centre rate decelerations can occur following the use of epidurals. ¹ Babies can develop fetal distress after epidural anesthesia. ¹¹ This may be caused by the mothers blood pressure getting so low that claret cannot be adequately pumped into the uterus to deliver oxygen to the baby. Every bit we mentioned above, epidurals make it difficult for the muscles in the arteries of the lower body to respond and to keep blood adequately flowing through the torso. The power of the heart to respond to irresolute needs of the body is impaired. ¹² Eberle and Norris ¹ propose that [i]nduction of maternal analgesia may transiently alter the rest between factors encouraging and discouraging uterine contraction. A temporary increment in the uterotonic furnishings of endogenous or exogenous oxytocin may and then produce a tetanic contraction with subsequent subtract fetal oxygen delivery and resultant fetal bradycardia.

Near babies of mothers receiving epidural anesthesia develop episodes of slow heart rate (bradycardia). ¹³ While this does not usually touch on the healthy baby, information technology can be disastrous for the baby that is already compromised from some other problem (frequently unknown to the doctors).

Adverse effects on the baby indicative of insufficient oxygen reaching the baby (late decelerations) tin can occur. These changes may as well result from a toxic effect to the baby of the local anesthetic given in the epidural.

The transient low blood force per unit area which always occurs after epidural anesthesia has been found to lead to significantly lower the baby'south claret pH. ¹⁴ This indicates excess blood acrid, normally meaning that the baby is not getting enough oxygen. Anesthesiologists don't retrieve that this makes any divergence in the baby's outcome, only we suspect, if we studied babies already at risk for other reasons, we would find that epidural significantly worsens compromised babies and may lead to a Cesarean birth when the infant might have otherwise tolerated a vaginal birth. We suspect that more than detailed research would identify a grouping of babies who would have tolerated unmedicated, normal birth, but who are unable to handle the added stress of the epidural, leading in the worst causes to death or permanent inability.

4. IV Cannulation:

Accidental injection of the anesthetic solution into the blood stream tin occur and tin cause the mother to twitch, have convulsions, or lose of consciousness. Seizures can occur from the toxic effects of the anesthetic agent inbound the blood stream. ¹⁵ Local coldhearted toxicity occurred among 12 women in one thousand epidurals. ¹⁶

5. Trauma to Blood Vessels:

Trauma to blood vessels can occur as a effect of epidural anesthesia. ¹⁷ In one study, bleeding in the spinal column and unintentional placement of the catheter into an artery or vein occurred 0.67% of the time (67 women of every m epidurals). ¹⁸ The catheter actually escapes outside of where it is supposed to go 1 to 6% of the fourth dimension. ¹⁹

Hemorrhages can occur around the spinal cord and even inside the skull following epidural anesthesia. ²⁰ These were associated with persistent backaches or headaches. Failure to treat these problems usually results in permanent paralysis. Surgery must exist performed within eight hours of the onset of paralysis or the prognosis is poor. Chronic subdural hematoma has resulted from epidural anesthesia and has even presented equally postal service-partum psychosis. ²¹

6. Punctured Dura:

The actual dura may exist punctured as a effect of epidural anesthesia. Considering of the large size of the needle used, severe headache may besides result. Dural punctures have been establish to occur about 1.8% of the fourth dimension. ²² Unintentional dural puncture occurred in 61 of 1000 epidurals in a University hospital (resulting in spinal anesthesia). ²³

seven. Infection:

An infection can develop at the site of injection. Bacterial meningitis tin occur from contamination during placement of the epidural. ²⁴ An abscess can also form at the site where the epidural catheter is placed. ²⁵ ²⁶

8. Backache:

Backache after an epidural is a common complexity. Back hurting commonly occurs after epidural anesthesia (eighteen.9% of the time ²⁷ ). Upper back pain tin can happen at some distance from the site where the epidural is injected. ²⁸ The dorsum pain can last very long-term. ²⁹ 19 percent of women had long-term backache later epidural anesthesia. ^xxx It probably results from a combination of its effects on the fretfulness and from extreme postures and stretching that occurs after the epidural during labor. Low back pain subsequently epidural anesthesia for childbirth is as well often mentioned. ³¹

nine. Broken catheters:

Occasionally the catheter has broken and a small piece is left in place. It usually causes no sick effects.

x. Aberrant Uterine Contractions:

Uterine contractions can go weaker and less frequent. An oxytocin infusion is and so necessary to improve labor and produce good force contractions Mothers having epidurals have longer labors and accept a higher incidence of the use of oxytocin than mothers having non-medicated deliveries. ³²

At that place are important risks of giving oxytocin also. Administration of this hormone to the mother during labor can crusade:

Dangerously high blood pressure.
Abnormal middle rhythms.
Nausea and vomiting.
Sustained uterine contractions which terminal too long and result in the infant going into distress from lack of oxygen. When this is also severe, the uterus tin can rupture. The epidural can mask the force of the uterine contractions and so that no ane knows that how stiff they are, making uterine rupture more than possible.
Hemorrhage around the brain.
Retention of water leading to convulsions and coma.
Bleeding in the pelvis and increased incidence of postpartum hemorrhage.
Expiry of the baby.
Jaundice of the baby.

11. Second Stage Labor Effects:

With big doses the patient loses the desire and the ability to acquit downwardly and push. This results in an increased use of forceps and vacuum extractions over women having unmedicated deliveries. ³³

12. Inadequate Pain Relief:

The epidural is mostly inadequate vii.one% of the time, leading to supplementation with intravenous pain medication 4.0% of the time and a general anesthetic iii.i% of the time (in one written report). ³⁴

13. Adventitious Spinal Anesthesia:

When an epidural accidentally turns into a spinal anesthetic, many complications tin occur:

Postspinal headaches.
Dysfunction of the bladder is frequent
Occasionally numbness and tingling (paresthesias) of the lower limbs and belly develop, and sometimes there is a temporary loss or diminution of sensation in these areas.
Unilateral footdrop (paralysis of the muscle that lifts the foot) has occurred.
Permanent nervus damage (conditions called chronic, progressive adhesive arachnoiditis or transverse myelitis) tin can occur. These lead to paralysis of the lower parts of the body.
Deaths have been reported.
Difficult breathing
Increased incidence of forceps deliveries.

The reliability of spinal anesthesia with 5% hyperbaric lignocaine was studied amidst 30 patients undergoing constituent Cesarean. Twelve patients had hypotension and iv developed severe postspinal headaches. The block progressed to the C2 dermatome in iv patients and was associated with dysphagia. This was totally unpredicted and was thought due to altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in tardily pregnancy. ³⁵

14. Maternal Heart Attack or Spinal Cord Ischemia:

The lack of power of the heart to pump blood around the body (from depression claret pressure or pooling of blood) can become then severe that a heart attack occurs or the spinal cord will suffer harm from not enough blood reaching it. ³⁶

15. Asthmatics:

Asthmatics tin become suddenly worse during epidural anesthesia ³⁷ with more wheezing and disability to jiff.

16. Medication interactions:

A hidden danger of epidural anesthesia is its interaction with medications (prostaglandins) commonly used to soften the cervix and start labor. The utilize of prostaglandins is common at hospitals and creates a potentially unsafe state of affairs in which the usual medications used to treat depression blood pressure during labor volition no longer work. ³⁸

17. Interactions Occur with Other Illnesses:

As an case, women who have migraines tin can have more visual disturbances later on epidurals. ³⁹

18. Maternal Fever & Cancerous Hyperthermia:

Maternal fever and fifty-fifty the severe status called malignant hyperthermia (dangerously loftier fever) can result. ⁴⁰ ⁴¹

19. Respiratory Arrests:

Mothers can stop breathing (respiratory arrest) ⁴² ⁴³ and can feel other animate difficulties. ⁴⁴ Greenhalgh ^* reported a 19 year old obstetric patient who had a respiratory abort before long afterwards receiving intrathecal sufentanil and bupivacaine equally role of a combined epidural/spinal technique for pain relief.

20. Other Neurological Disabilties:

Other neurological disabilities (including a condition called Horners syndrome) tin develop along with hoarseness (from even just one dose of epidural anesthetic). ⁴⁵ Clayton ⁴⁶ reported an incidence of Horner's syndrome during epidural anesthesia for constituent Caesarean section of iv%. The incidence of Horner's syndrome with epidural anesthesia for vaginal commitment was one.33%. They plant it impossible to predict which patients would develop a Horner'southward syndrome. Even the nerves to the face can exist blocked, sometimes temporarily, sometimes permanently. ⁴⁷ Tremors and shakes can occur. ⁴⁸ ⁴⁹

Paresthesias (persistent tingling from sensory nerves) occurred in 0.16% of patients in i study (1.6 per 1000) with an incidence of persistent neuropathy of 0.04% (4 per 10,000). ^fifty Four of these patients had a neuropathy which eventually resolved. In another study 3.0% of patients had tingling of the hands or fingers, while 26 of well-nigh 5000 women had persistent tingling or numbness in the lower back, buttocks or legs. ⁵¹

Dizziness and fainting tin can become a problem afterwards epidurals. One study found these symptoms persisting in 2.1% of women. ⁵²

21. Nausea and Vomiting:

20 to thirty percent of women experience nausea after epidural anesthesia, while iii to vii% have vomiting. ⁵³

22. Allergic Conditions:

A dangerous allergic status with shock (called anaphylaxis) can occur. ⁵⁴ The woman develops a blood-red rash (erythema), itches, and her lungs fill up with fluid (pulmonary edema). Excessive lung fluid is also plant in the babies in these cases. ⁵⁵

23. Heart Problems:

Mothers can experience excessively slow heart rates (bradycardia), heart block in which the electrical activity of the chambers of the heart become dissociated and sometimes even stoppage of the eye (cardiac arrest). ⁵⁶

24. Headache:

Headache later epidural is a persistent trouble that is more pronounced in younger patients. ⁵⁷ One report found its incidence after epidural anesthesia to be 4.half dozen%, significantly more often than women not having epidurals. ⁵⁸ It ordinarily occurs from the furnishings of puncturing the dura. Headache can also occur from air getting into the spinal fluid (called an iatrogenic pneumocephalus). The air is introduced into the spinal fluid and column when the test dose is given that is assumed to be in the extra-dural space. When the person giving the epidural feels a loss of resistance to the injection of air, this is when a pneumocephalus tin can occur. The patient that was described complained immediately of astringent headache on both sides of her forehead followed by airsickness. The babe had to be delivered by Cesarean with general anesthesia. The patients headache resolved in 24 hours later on Cesarean.

Of 34 women with spinal headache (from 4766 epidurals), nine had long-term disability from headache. 5 of these were from adventitious dural puncture and iv occurred afterwards accidental spinal block. ⁵⁹

25. Motor Occludent:

Epidural anesthesia tin produce motor blockade, resulting in temporary paralysis, even of respiratory muscles. ⁶⁰

26. Utilise in VBAC:

Epidurals are sometimes used with women desiring VBAC. Leung, et al. ⁶¹ studied the maternal and fetal consequences of uterine rupture during VBAC. They concluded that significant neonatal morbidity occurred when > or = xviii minutes elapsed between the onset of prolonged deceleration and commitment. In 106 cases of uterine rupture at their establishment between January i, 1983 and June 30, 1992, seven charts were incomplete and excluded; of the remainder, 28 patients had complete, xiii patients had partial, and 58 patients had no fetal extrusion into the maternal belly. Maternal characteristics or intrapartum events were non predictive of the catastrophic extent of uterine rupture. There was one maternal death. Complete fetal extrusion was associated with a higher incidence of perinatal bloodshed and morbidity.

27. Technical Considerations:

Epidural anesthesia is a technical process that requires significant skill to identify correctly. Many papers document the technical aspects of this procedure which are not insignificant. For case, 23% of epidural catheters inserted more than 2 cm into the epidural infinite required manipulation. Epidural catheters inserted eight cm within the epidural space were more likely to result in four cannulation. Epidural catheters inserted two cm within the epidural infinite were more likely to become dislodged. Epidural catheters inserted 2 to 4 cm within the epidural space required replacement more often than catheters inserted deeper. ⁶²

28. Herpes Simplex Assocation:

Epidural analgesia is associated with recurrence of herpes simplex blepharitis afterward cesarean section when epidural morphine is given. ⁶³

Example Examples (Mild Problems)

Hither is an example of a 30 twelvemonth old adult female having her first baby who was admitted to the hospital at 2 cm dilation at 11:05 pm. ⁶⁴ Past four:30 am, she was 4 cm dilated with her waters cleaved and requested epidural anesthesia. Her mother and her hubby were in attendance coaching her. The epidural was started at 5:01 am and within xxx seconds, the patients heart rate began to climb steadily and precipitously from 88 to 174, levelling off at that rate.

The certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) discovered that the patient had previously experienced heart palpitations: when stressed or with heavy exercise. She had begun to feel mild nausea and dizziness. Oxygen was administered and an iv drug (adenosine) was given. A second dose followed five minutes after. The abnormal heart rate (a supraventricular tachycardia) returned to normal and the woman had a normal vaginal delivery inside 6 hours of this episode. This occurred presumable from a sensitivity to medication placed through the epidural catheter. When complications such as this occur, fetal scalp electrodes are usually placed to monitor the babe's EKG. The therapy sometimes causes severe hypotension.

A case has been reported in which a 24 year old adult female with a past history of balmy backache had an epidural anesthesia. She had an acute vagal reaction with loss of consciousness and her head falling forward. Thirty-six hours later, she complained of severe pains all over her spine, together with sciatica and spasm of the muscles on either side of the spinal column (paravertebral muscles). None of these symptoms responded to drug treatment. The pain somewhen disappeared after she wore a cervical collar, taking anti-inflammatory drugs and having spinal manipulations (what chiropractors and osteopaths do) Information technology was thought that her backache was due to what is called a posterior articular joint syndrome in which the forrard fall of her head strained the posterior joints of the spinal column. ⁶⁵

Permanent Disability from Epidural Anesthesia

a. A disabling condition called spinal arachnoiditis can develop after epidural anesthesia. Of half dozen such women, 3 were permanently confined to a wheelchair three years after their initial evaluation. ⁶⁶ None of these patients had any prior spinal surgery or trauma or problems with the spinal cord including previous hemorrhage, infections or other known causes of arachnoiditis. They had no neurological symptoms prior to epidural anesthesia. The diagnosis was confirmed by a medical test chosen myelography in all cases. The epidurals were uneventful and performed co-ordinate to standard methods.

Arachnoiditis is probably caused from the epidural injection of foreign substances (the anesthetic itself or contaminants in the solution) into the spinal canal.

Subarachnoid cysts can occur in the spine from arachnoiditis produced from the epidural anesthetic. ⁶⁷

b. Paralysis can occur. ⁶⁸ The injection of the local anesthetic into the epidural space can result in the veins becoming engorged, the spinal string suffering from a lack of oxygen (hypoxia) and the woman developing astute neurological problems. Some of these deficits tin become permanent. ⁶⁹ Paralysis tin can also occur from bleeding into the area during the epidural injection with the germination of a pocket of claret pressing on the spinal cord (hematoma). It tin too occur from infection or trauma.

Cranial nerve paralysis can occur at quite a distance from the site of the epidural. This is thought to occur from traction on the spinal string. ^lxx

Paralysis tin occur from a condition called anterior spinal avenue syndrome after epidural anesthesia during labor. ⁷¹ Paralysis can occur when the blood period to the spinal cord becomes then limited that tissue dies. This is called an infarction. A case study of an infarction subsequently epidural anesthesia has been published in which leg paralysis occurred and did not recover. A loss of sensation to pain and temperature also occurred to the level of the mid-chest which partially resolved. ⁷²

Of 108 not-fatal complications in one written report, v were associated with permanent inability. ⁷³ These included damage (neuropathy) to a single spinal nervus, astute toxicity from the local anesthetic, and problems associated with accidental puncture of the dura to go a spinal coldhearted.

Another patient adult paralysis later epidural anesthesia probably due to the anterior spinal artery or central arteries being blocked during the epidural and leading to death of part of the spinal string. ⁷⁴

Neuropathy is a condition in which sensory changes occur (loss of sensation or hypersensitivity to awareness) with or without chronic hurting. Neuropathy occurs subsequently epidural anesthesia. Information technology can occur from thrombosis of an artery from trauma from the epidural injection or from the catheter. A lack of adequate claret period (and therefore oxygen) is called ischemia. This tin can crusade neuropathy also. ⁷⁵

Deaths from Epidural Anesthesia

Hither are some examples of women who have died from epidural anesthesia to illustrate the dangers.

A healthy, 31 year one-time woman having her 3rd child requested epidural anesthesia and developed an astute status of fluid in the lungs (pulmonary edema). She could not be successfully resuscitated. The baby too died. ⁷⁶

Sudden stoppage of the center (cardiac abort) tin occur during epidural anesthesia. ⁷⁷ ⁷⁸ along with other eye rhythm changes. ⁷⁹ Sudden cardiac arrest may be caused past air getting into veins during placement of the epidural. ⁸⁰

Respiratory insufficiency can occur and cause decease. In one instance report, the patient initially developed pain in the shoulder-cervix region subsequently epidural anesthesia, followed by fever and an elevated white blood count. This led to a high-level (arms and legs) paralysis with an inability to breath. Many problems and then developed with the heart and arterial organization. An abscess was plant and the patient was somewhen stabilized with antibiotics. The patient required chronic mechanical ventilation and died of recurrent pneumonia later five months of intensive care. The incidence of animate difficulties in one report was 0.54%, although only v% of those patients required prolonged artificial ventilation. Full spinal anesthesia occurred in 0.013% of the epidurals but more than than one-half of these cases required intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Partial spinal anesthesia (sub-arachnoid cake) occurred in 0.04% of the cases. ⁸¹

Women are almost never given informed consent for epidurals. Even if they were just read ii paragraphs from the package insert that comes with the medication used for epidurals (manufactured by Abbott Laboratories), they might think twice. The package insert states:

Local anesthetics quickly cross the placenta, and when used for epidural, caudal or pudendal anesthesia, can crusade varying degrees of maternal, fetal and neonatal toxicity....

Adverse reactions in the parturient, fetus and neonate involve alternations of the central nervous organisation, peripheral vascular tone and cardiac function....

Neurologic effects following epidural or caudal anesthesia may include spinal cake of varying magnitude (including loftier or total spinal block); hypotension secondary to spinal block; urinary retention; fecal and urinary incontinence; loss of perineal awareness and sexual part; persistent anesthesia, paresthesia, weakness, paralysis of the lower extremities and loss of sphincter control all of which may take slow, incomplete or no recovery; headache; backache; septic meningitis; meningismus; slowing of labor; increased incidence of forceps delivery; cranial nerve palsies due to traction on fretfulness from loss of cerebrospinal fluid.

Who would sign a consent if information technology included the above language? The degree to which the facts about the risks of epidural anesthesia are hidden from women in labor is astonishing.

Mothers who have a fever are significantly more than probable to have had epidural anesthesia. ⁸² Therefor increasing the incidence of septic workups on newborns and the subsequent complications of this procedure.

We would hope that pregnant women would take a more than informed caption of the risks of epidural anesthesia than what is currently given, and would suspect that many would brand other choices if truthful informed consent was given (earlier labor, when the adult female nonetheless has time to prepare to cope with childbirth pain in other ways).

Critique of iii Other Studies

As we said the study we just discussed was the merely prospective written report. The other three studies are papers non yet published and then we tin only comment on the abstracts of these studies, they were "presented" at the conference of the American Society of Anesthesiologists in November of 1997. Presented ways that the paper was talked most at the conference and has non necessarily been accepted past a major medical journal for publication as of even so and may/or may not be.

1st Additional Study:

TITLE: Does epidural analgesia protect against cesarean section in nulliparous patients?

AUTHORS: DJ Burnbach, MD, A Grunebaum, Md, DJ Stem, Doc, B Katgaem Physician, MM Kuroda, MPH, DM Thys, MD

Affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology and Ob/Gyn, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Eye, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia Academy, New York, NY

INTRODUCTION: Recent articles have suggested that epidural analgesia may increase the chance of cesarean section. (1,2) In an try to evaluate whether epidural analgesia during labor is associated with an increased risk of cesarean department at our institution, we evaluated the labor data of nulliparous patients who delivered at the hospital between 1989-1995.

METHODS: From Jan 1, 1989 -December 31, 1995, there were a total of 31,670 deliveries at the St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Middle. The 13,203 nulliparous patients who delivered under the care of an obstetrician during that menstruum of fourth dimension constituted the study population. The post-obit were the independent variables: blazon of labor analgesia administered, patient historic period, obstetric care provider (private vs. non-private), nascency weight, and use of oxytocin for stimulation or consecration. The dependent variable was the delivery mode. A non-hierarchical logistic regression was performed to make up one's mind which of these independent variables contributed to the hazard of cesarean section.

RESULTS: Logistic analysis demonstrated that the highest risks for cesarean section were associated with oxytocin induction and maternal age. As shown in Table 1, other pregnant predictors of cesarean delivery were oxytocin for stimulation, patient condition (individual patients were at an increased risk of cesarean section) and birth weight. Epidural analgesia, on the other hand, was associated with a slightly decreased chance for cesarean section. For example, patients under 30 years of age who were induced with oxytocin who received epidural analgesia had a 32% cesarean section rate (230/719) versus a 39.1% cesarean department charge per unit (70/179) for the same group of patients who did not receive an epidural coldhearted. Patients greater than 29 years of age who were induced with oxytocin and received an epidural had a 45.4% cesarean section rate (114/251) versus a 58% cesarean section rate (51/88) for the same group of patients who did not receive an epidural.

Table 1:

Contained Variables	Odds Ratio	Conviction Interval
Oxytocin Induction	1.93	1.70 - two.19
Maternal Historic period (per 10 years)	1.60	1.53 - 1.68
Birth Weight (per 1000g)	i.20	1.13 - 1.27
Oxytocin Stimulation	1.17	1.06 - ane.30
Patient Status (pvt. vs clinic)	1.10	1.01 - 1.xvi
Epidural Analgesia	0.89	0.81 - 0.97

DISCUSSION: Our information support other studies that have shown an increased risk of cesarean section with use of oxytocin, increased maternal age, and private patient status.(3) When controlled for other variables, the administration of epidural analgesia was associated with a decreased risk of cesarean section. Based on our information, we suggest that epidural analgesia as proficient at our institution, is associated with a decrease in cesarean section rate in nulliparous patients.

1. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:993-1000
2. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:851-viii
iii. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1881-5

CRITIQUE:

A major statistical trouble with the study, which prevents the authors from making the conclusions they take fabricated, is the failure to consider the interaction between epidural anesthesia and oxytocin stimulation. Many studies have shown that epidural anesthesia increases the need for oxytocin stimulations [refs]. A proper statistical procedure would take been to utilize an interactive term for epidural and oxytocin stimulation.

I would have started with a multivariate assay of variance which would have considered the interaction between epidural anesthesia and the other variables. The authors believe (erroneously) that they are dealing with independent variables. Clearly we all know that there is an association between oxytocin consecration and epidurals (more difficult labors; more than probable to have an epidural), maternal age (younger and older mothers are more likely to have epidurals), oxytocin stimuation (women who take epidurals are more likely to need oxytocin stimuation because of the desultory outcome of the epidural on uterine contractions, private patients are more likely to take epidurals.

The more sophisticated approach to their paper would have been to utilize a technique such as structural equations modeling (LISREL, or related procedures) to test paths of effects. For case, 1 can test the hypothesis that epidurals bear upon the cesarean rate through their effect on the need for uterine stimulation. That could still be done with the authors' data, and nosotros programme to challenge them to an independent data analysis (past our colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh) using path analysis to test these hypotheses.

Simply using logistic regression in this context was inappropriately simplistic, but washed probably considering information technology supported their bias (epidurals are practiced!). I suspect the authors are well-informed and have splendid biostatistical consultation, and chose non to report these other analyses that they probably did, because these other analyses did not support their position.

I would describe your attention to another part of the abstract. Is it reasonable do to exercise cesareans on 58% of women who are older than 29 years and are being induced? Are these numbers generalizable? I was shocked to read this effigy. In all my experience in obstetrics, I tin can't imagine how you can perform a cesarean on 58% of the women over historic period 29 whom you lot are inducing.

I would very much similar to encounter their criteria for cesarean. With such high rates (45% in the epidural group and 58% in the non-epidural grouping), I question how generalizable these results are to good exercise elsewhere. Mayhap in an environment (consider how stressful this surroundings must be) in which such high cesarean rates occur, epidurals do decrease the risk for cesarean if you are being induced, but I can't believe that such high cesarean rates plant safe and prudent practise.

I would similar to see their overall complication rates, including mail service-partum infection and the backache/headache complications of epidurals. I suspect their morbidity is quite high.

2nd & third Additional Studies:

Two other studies shed some light on this debate. The first is Newton ER, Schroeder BC, Knape KG, Bennett BL. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85:749-55.

"Continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl did not event in a change in myometrial contractility in the showtime hour after initiation of analgesia. However, despite more than oxytocin therapy, the rate of cervical dilation was significantly slower in the epidural group than in the nonepidural group (1.9 versus 5.6 cm/hr, p < 0.001). Operative deliveries were more common in patients with epidural analgesia than in those without it (12 of 62 versus 2 of 124, p < 0.0001). After epidural analgesia, myometrial contractility is maintained with oxytocin, only the power of the uterus to dilate the uterus is reduced significantly."

Also important, Albers LL, Anderson D, Cragin L, Daniels SM, Hunter C, Sedler KD, Teaf D. The relationship of ambulation in labor to operative delivery. JNM 1997; 42(ane):4-eight.

"Women who ambulated for a significant amount of time during labor (compared with those who did not ambulate) had half the charge per unit of operative delivery (2.7% versus 5.v%)." It's very hard to ambulate with either an epidural or PCIA.

Two others studies take been widely quoted in the popular printing. They included a study by Dr. Steven Fogel, an anesthesiologist at Washington University School of Medicine, in St. Louis. Dr. Fogel looked at data on seven,000 patients delivering over a 28 month period at his hospital. He compared cesarean rates for kickoff time mothers earlier the introduction of an epidural on need anesthesia service to cesarean rates after the introduction of the service, finding no change. What isn't reported is how obstetrical practices changed during this time interval, a very significant cistron. Such historical studies are notoriously unreliable considering policies modify so rapidly in obstetrical management. Without such information, the written report is meaningless.

The last report was done at Boston'southward Beth Isreal-Deaconess Medical Heart by anesthesiologist Steven Pratt. This report reviewed the labor and delivery records of more than 2300 women who received ultra-low dose solutions of epidural medications. The study showed that women who needed additional pain relief beyond the low-doses were more likely to have cesareans than women who did not. Dr. Pratt argued that it was harder labors that caused cesareans and not epidurals. This report was so anecdotal as to be inappreciably worth commenting upon. What Dr. Pratt failed to note was that several others studies have shown that patient satisfaction with low-dose epidurals is very low and that more than one-half of women accept additional medication. Pratt's study actually supports the bespeak of view that epidurals lead to increased cesareans, when this data is taken into account.

What is astonishing is the propagandizing that went on in the press. The gold standard in medicine consists of randomized, controlled trials. These take been done and do by and large show increased cesarean rates. To try and argue against these much better quality studies with retrospective studies using historical controls is poor science, but clearly good propaganda. To conclude nosotros listing some of these studies and their conclusions:

Prospective Clinical Trials Investigating the Association between Epidural Analgesia and Cesarean Birth Rates by Randomizing Women to a Narcotic versus an Epidural Grouping:
Reference and Parity Sample Size Relative Take chances of Cesarean Birth with Epidural Analgesia (95% CI)

1. Combined 111 2.8 (0.eight-10.0)
two. Nulliparous 93 11.iv (5.8-16.9)*
3. Nulliparous** 693 2.6 (1.five-4.3)*

Parous** 637 3.8 (1.3-11.0)*
Combined*** 869 2.three (ane.3-4.0)*
All iii prospective trials combined 1073 2.v (1.vi-four.0)****,*

* Relative risk is statistically significant at least at p < 0.05

** This represents the odds ratio for all women in the study adjusted by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

*** The cesarean birth charge per unit was significantly greater (p = 0.002) in the epidural grouping (nine%, 39/432) compared with the narcotic group (4%, 17/437).

**** Comparing of the proportions by Mantel-Haenszel yields a chi-squared of 18.1 and a p-value of 0.00003.

1. Phillipsen T, Jensen NH. Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic on nulliparous labor; a randomized report concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 30:27-33.

2. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM. The upshot of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: A randomized prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:851-858.

References

Eberle RL, Norris MC. Labour analgesia: A risk-benefit assay. Drug-Saf 1996; fourteen(4):239-251.
Kantor One thousand. Obstetrical epidural anesthesia in a rural Canadian hospital. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:390-iii.
Thorp JA, Parisi VM, Boylan PC, Johnston DA. The issue of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women [see comments]. American Periodical of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989 Sep;161(three):670-five.
Adashek JA, Peaceman AM, Lopez-Zeno JA, Minogue JP, Socol ML. Factors contributing to the increased cesarean nascence rate in older parturient women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1993 October;169(4):936-40
David J. Birnbach, M.D., Steven T. Fogel, M.D., Stephen D. Pratt, 1000.D.; New Data Debunks Conventionalities that Epidurals Cause Cesarean sections, San Diego, Press Release, American Gild of Anesthesiologists, 1998.
Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Ramin SM, Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. Cesarean Delivery: A randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:487-94.
Twelve Years and More than 30,000 Nurse Midwife-Attended Births: The Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Women'south Hospital Birth Eye Experience: Journal of Nurse midwifery Vol 39, No 4, July Aug 94.
Webb and Kantor, 1992
Haire DB. Obstetric drugs: their effects on mother and child. Encyclopedia of Childbearing, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1993.
[Hetland, et al., 1989]
[Rosay, et al., 1989]
[Parnass and Schmidt, 1990]
[Marx, et al., 1990]
[Philipson, et al., 1989]
[Dunne and Kox, 1991]
[Tanaka, et al., 1993]
[Skidmore, 1991]
[Tanaka, et al., 1993]
[Halpenny, et al., 1992]
[Schmidt and Nolte, 1992]
[Campbell & Varma,1993]
[Webb and Kantor, 1992]
[Tanaka, et al., 1993]
[Berga and Trierweiler, 1989]
[Goucke and Graziotti, 1990]
[Sonden, 1991]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
[Rajanna, 1989]
[Anonymous, Lancet, 1990a,b]
[MacArthur, et al., 1990]
McQuay H, Moore A. Epidural anesthesia and low back hurting after delivery (letter). BMJ 1996; 312(7030): 581.
[Sepkoski, et al., 1992]
[Sepkoski, et al., 1992]
[Webb and Kantor, 1992]
[Bembridge, et al., 1986]
[Girompaire, et al., 1990]
[Eldor, et al., 1989]
[Veeckman, et al., 1989]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
[Anonymous, Lancet, 1989]
[Vanek and Valenta, 1989]
[Fortuna, 1989]
[Lee and Collins, 1990]
[Tembo and Hills, 1990]
[Tabatabia, et al., 1989]
[Clayton, 1989]
[Gazmuri, et al., 1992]
[Branda and Tumbarello, 1990]
[ Basora, et al., 1990]
[Tanaka, et al., 1993]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
[Anecdote, et al., 1989]
[Zucker-Pinchoff and Ramanathan, 1989]
[Thomas and Caunt, 1993]
[Parnass and Schmidt, 1990]
[Parnass and Schmidt, 1990]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
[MacArthur, et al., 1992]
Greenhalgh CA. Respiratory arrest in a parturient following intrathecal injection of sufentanil and bupivacaine. Amazement 1996; 51(two):173-175.
[Leung, et al., 1993]
Eberle and Norris, 1996, op cit.
DAngelo R, Berkebile BL, Gerancher JC. Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion. Anesthesiology 1996; 84(1) 88-93.
[Stickes, 1993]
[LeBorgne, et al., 1991]
[Sghirlanzoni, et al., 1989]
[Sklar, et al., 1991]
[Parnass and Schmidt, 1990]
[Sghirlanzoni, et al., 1989 Oct]
[Whiting et al., 1990]
[Ackerman, et al., 1990]
[Gaudin and Lefant, 1990]
[Scott and Hibbard, 1990]
[Hachisuka, et al., 1991]
[Veselis, 1990]
[Van Zundert and Scott, 1989]
[Guild and Crilley, 1990]
[Watanabe, et al., 1990]
[Elstein and Marx, 1990]
[Williams, et al., 1991]
[Xie and Liu, 1991]
[Klaus et al. 1993:47]

Related Resources:

New: From Gary Cipher's comprehensive website: Women's Health: Pregnancy & Childbirth. This series examines medical risks with summaries of medical studies of many topics including fertility, cesarean department, episiotomy, home vs. hospital delivery, antenatal care, fetal centre monitoring, and breast feeding vs. formula feeding.

jenningsbechapte.blogspot.com

Source: http://www.healing-arts.org/mehl-madrona/mmepidural.htm

*	Relative risk is statistically significant at least at p < 0.05
**	This represents the odds ratio for all women in the study adjusted by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
***	The cesarean birth charge per unit was significantly greater (p = 0.002) in the epidural grouping (nine%, 39/432) compared with the narcotic group (4%, 17/437).
****	Comparing of the proportions by Mantel-Haenszel yields a chi-squared of 18.1 and a p-value of 0.00003.